The reasons for the large number of codes are: Codes tend to be industry and application specific. Piping; Pipeline; Structural; Aerospace; Petrochemical etc. Codes tend to be jurisdiction specific. While theoretically it would be possible for everyone to just go to a single set of codes, there are political and strategic reasons that states and organizations may not want to do this.

Author:Shaktilkis Daim
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Health and Food
Published (Last):14 December 2005
PDF File Size:10.65 Mb
ePub File Size:19.97 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

When AWS American National Standards are either incorporated in, or made part of, documents that are included in federal or state laws and regulations, or the regulations of other governmental bodies, their provisions carry the full legal authority of the statute.

In such cases, any changes in those AWS standards must be approved by the governmental body having statutory jurisdiction before they can become a part of those laws and regulations. In all cases, these standards carry the full legal authority of the contract or other document that invokes the AWS standards.

Where this contractual relationship exists, changes in or deviations from requirements of an AWS standard must be by agreement between the contracting parties.

AWS disclaims liability for any injury to persons or to property, or other damages of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect, consequential, or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting from the publication, use of, or reliance on this standard. AWS also makes no guarantee or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein. In issuing and making this standard available, AWS is neither undertaking to render professional or other services for or on behalf of any person or entity, nor is AWS undertaking to perform any duty owed by any person or entity to someone else.

Anyone using these documents should rely on his or her own independent judgment or, as appropriate, seek the advice of a competent professional in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances.

It is assumed that the use of this standard and its provisions is entrusted to appropriately qualified and competent personnel. This standard may be superseded by the issuance of new editions. This standard may also be corrected through publication of amendments or errata.

It may also be supplemented by publication of addenda. Information on the latest editions of AWS standards including amendments, errata, and addenda are posted on the AWS web page www.

Users should ensure that they have the latest edition, amendments, errata, and addenda. Publication of this standard does not authorize infringement of any patent or trade name. Users of this standard accept any and all liabilities for infringement of any patent or trade name items. AWS disclaims liability for the infringement of any patent or product trade name resulting from the use of this standard.

The AWS does not monitor, police, or enforce compliance with this standard, nor does it have the power to do so. On occasion, text, tables, or figures are printed incorrectly, constituting errata. Such errata, when discovered, are posted on the AWS web page www.

Official interpretations of any of the technical requirements of this standard may only be obtained by sending a request, in writing, to the appropriate technical committee. These opinions are offered solely as a convenience to users of this standard, and they do not constitute professional advice. Such opinions represent only the personal opinions of the particular individuals giving them. These individuals do not speak on behalf of AWS, nor do these oral opinions constitute official or unofficial opinions or interpretations of AWS.

In addition, oral opinions are informal and should not be used as a substitute for an official interpretation. It must be reviewed every five years, and if not revised, it must be either reaffirmed or withdrawn. Comments recommendations, additions, or deletions and any pertinent data that may be of use in improving this standard are required and should be addressed to AWS Headquarters. Such comments will receive careful consideration by the AWS D14 Committee on Machinery and Equipment and the author of the comments will be informed of the Committees response to the comments.

Procedures for appeal of an adverse decision concerning all such comments are provided in the Rules of Operation of the Technical Activities Committee. While the AWS administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the development of consensus, it does not independently test, evaluate, or verify the accuracy of any information or the soundness of any judgments contained in its standards.



Welding Codes



Popular Publishers


Related Articles